For over 600 Wells, 50 pump stations, 15 boosters, 25 storm systems, 400 lift stations and 8 wastewater plants? On Jun 9, 2016 9:13 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Really, if its subsidized, depending on the actual current and realistic > near term future bandwidth demands, a primarily bulk cellular data with on > demand ptp and ptmp solution for gap fillers might be well worth looking > into. Review the entire infrastructure and build some data banking > locations to aggregate any non real time demand to off peak syncronization > locations. > > owning a network is always ideal when conditions are ideal, but from the > sounds of it, thats just not the case > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I would recommend 11GHz for ptp...I would test the Cambium and Ubiquiti >> 900 since antennas are in place...but I am thinking of LTE MuMimo solutions >> as well.. with all the tanks they have I would reduce long links to >> closest one...right now most shoot to one tank....the original 1993 design >> is obsolete >> On Jun 9, 2016 8:07 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe 4.9 GHz LOS links between towers, and Cambium PMP450i and PTP450i >>> in 900 MHz for the NLOS links? >>> >>> As long as they stick with cameras that have reasonable BW requirements. >>> >>> >>> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:52 AM >>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] If it was you... >>> >>> >>> 4.9 is not a good option due to existing public safety links on both >>> sides of border. The new PLCs from Allen Bradley are IP based as well >>> other gear they are now using. Also heard they are considering cameras at >>> Wells not just boosters and wastewater. >>> On Jun 9, 2016 7:43 AM, "Cameron Crum" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If they have to have the data throughput then I'd tell them to go with >>>> 4.9 and leave the unlicensed guys alone. But, do they really need it? Is >>>> this like using a backhoe to dig a fence post hole? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Make sure the big ‘ol wall people want ends up blocking the RF? lol >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> While working at Storm Water site today, one of the water Co. SCADA >>>>> guys came by... he discussed that they are looking at WiMax and also >>>>> 4.9GHz >>>>> to replace existing licensed 900mhz network for our 600 locations. They >>>>> are using MDS SD9 radios for MAS and LEDR for ptp.... they want to move up >>>>> to faster Ethernet based radios.... I listened and offered no >>>>> comments....I >>>>> was not about to tell them about WiMAX or that our sister city has over >>>>> 200 >>>>> 4.9GHz links in operation since 2010...I have ideas of what I would >>>>> do...Some background.... .many remote links are NLOS...easy to do with >>>>> their existing 5 Watt licensed radios and APs on 150 Ft elevated tanks or >>>>> mountain. ptp links are easy for most of east and lower valley because of >>>>> tanks available and mountain locations....let's see what you gurus >>>>> suggest....we are on border and it is very noisy in all bands. I mean all >>>>> bands >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
