The NetVana 1544 is also a L3 Switch and does OSPF/BGP too! Heh.
> On Jun 13, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > > There -could- be a router doing L3 behind the switch. It's not that > uncommon, right? > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Switch? If people do layer 2 over $6,000+ microwave for backbone links > between two POPs, that is a really bad idea in my opinion. WISPs love to > build layer 2 clusterfucks because a lot of small ones start with basically > no OSPF or BGP knowledge. > > Show me a real router platform that is in common use that supports 2.5 Gbps > SFP (not SFP+ on a rate limited port). > > On Jun 11, 2016 10:29 AM, "Jon Auer" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Adtran NetVanta 1544 Ethernet switches (24xGigE, 4xSFP) have been 2.5G > capable since 2009. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > There are such things as 2.5 Gbps SFPs used for fiber channel storage array > applications (example: Cisco MDS9000) but you will not see them used in > ethernet speaking routers/switches. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Erich Kaiser <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Check with John, but I thought he said something about a 2.5Gbps SFP, not > sure why they did not go 10G.... > > > Erich Kaiser > North Central Tower > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Office: 630-621-4804 <tel:630-621-4804> > Cell: 630-777-9291 <tel:630-777-9291> > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > So I’m checking out the new Trango StrataPro data sheets… The Xi model > appears to do 4Gbps full-duplex.. but no 10G SFP+.. So I’d have to use all > three SFPs, and one copper gig to get it? > > Other notes: it appears they’re keying it up.. so you get to pay extra to > unlock capacity to 1100Mbps and again to unlock max capacity to 2200Mbps. > Oh and if you want AES-256, you get to pay again. The 1MB packet buffer.. > seems low. > > Anybody else have any thoughts? Anybody got one yet? > > -c > > > >
