The maximum data rate of the original SFP (not SFP+) is 5Gbps. http://www.fibertronics-store.com/SFP-Transceiver-Module-2125-25Gbps-Singlemode-1310nm-10km-SFP-LX-SM-0310.htm;jsessionid=C0567AE6A1D4557BB5A62DA702510539.m1plqscsfapp02?gclid=Cj0KEQjw1v66BRCV-6rh6s-Biu8BEiQAelpui52zXMUfBX3fY-sliWxvVsGncI5j878U1hjTeixFJLEaApen8P8HAQ
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > Switch? If people do layer 2 over $6,000+ microwave for backbone links > between two POPs, that is a really bad idea in my opinion. WISPs love to > build layer 2 clusterfucks because a lot of small ones start with basically > no OSPF or BGP knowledge. > > Show me a real router platform that is in common use that supports 2.5 Gbps > SFP (not SFP+ on a rate limited port). > > On Jun 11, 2016 10:29 AM, "Jon Auer" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Adtran NetVanta 1544 Ethernet switches (24xGigE, 4xSFP) have been 2.5G >> capable since 2009. >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> There are such things as 2.5 Gbps SFPs used for fiber channel storage >>> array applications (example: Cisco MDS9000) but you will not see them used >>> in ethernet speaking routers/switches. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Erich Kaiser >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Check with John, but I thought he said something about a 2.5Gbps SFP, >>>> not sure why they did not go 10G.... >>>> >>>> >>>> Erich Kaiser >>>> North Central Tower >>>> [email protected] >>>> Office: 630-621-4804 >>>> Cell: 630-777-9291 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So I’m checking out the new Trango StrataPro data sheets… The Xi model >>>>> appears to do 4Gbps full-duplex.. but no 10G SFP+.. So I’d have to use all >>>>> three SFPs, and one copper gig to get it? >>>>> >>>>> Other notes: it appears they’re keying it up.. so you get to pay extra >>>>> to unlock capacity to 1100Mbps and again to unlock max capacity to >>>>> 2200Mbps. >>>>> Oh and if you want AES-256, you get to pay again. The 1MB packet >>>>> buffer.. seems low. >>>>> >>>>> Anybody else have any thoughts? Anybody got one yet? >>>>> >>>>> -c >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
