We typically do an RB750 demarc to our customers. When we put this in we do OSPF on it and put the customer's /29 (or whatever) on the customer face port. When that port gets link, it advertises the customer /29 to the rest of our network.
In this case I created a static route on the BMU (Powercode router) to the customer's ePMP SM. I had previously thought that the entire public range was routed to the BMU (it wasn't, it learns via OSPF). This means the outside world would get to our core BGP router and it wouldn't know where to go. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Care to explain? > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Josh Luthman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Issue on my end! Works perfectly fine if you do it right. These aren't > the > > droids you're looking for, move along... > > > > > > Josh Luthman > > Office: 937-552-2340 > > Direct: 937-552-2343 > > 1100 Wayne St > > Suite 1337 > > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> I almost set one up that way last week, but decided to just put it in > >> bridge mode with a Mikrotik behind it instead... apparently that was a > good > >> decision. > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Josh Luthman > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> ...yup :) > >>> > >>> Josh Luthman > >>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>> 1100 Wayne St > >>> Suite 1337 > >>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>> > >>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:58 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Ahh OK. Got ya. Basic router mode doesn't work? That's weird. > >>>> > >>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:53 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe the first one? Don't want the other two. > >>>>> > >>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:48 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't think you understand how English works. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Go back and read what you wrote. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Maybe I'm not understanding the situation, but it sounds like > they're > >>>>>> simply not enabling one or more of: IP forwarding, NAT module, > connection > >>>>>> tracking. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:41 AM, "Josh Luthman" < > [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Imagine a mikrotik defaulted. IP on wlan1 and IP on eth1. That, > no > >>>>>>> firewall srcnat. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:37 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What? What your saying doesn't make any sense. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:34 AM, "Josh Luthman" > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Yup > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:22 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Masquerade is s-nat.... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:21 AM, "Josh Luthman" > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Basically NAT with the masquerade off. I'm going to lab and > work > >>>>>>>>>>> with Cambium here in a bit. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:10 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies. Looks like we are just using the NAT mode not > router > >>>>>>>>>>>> mode.. I just didn't realize it for whatever reason. I've got > a lab setup > >>>>>>>>>>>> for EPMP I can play with.. what are you trying to accomplish? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:36 AM, "Josh Luthman" > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.6.2? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:44 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It works as expected here. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 21, 2016 11:40 PM, "Josh Luthman" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the outside world to the LAN IP nothing. From my > house > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (the same /23 of publics) it does ping. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the wired side of the epmp radio I could not ping the > RF > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface IP. Or anything farther away. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:33 AM, George Skorup > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about a traceroute from upstream to the SM LAN? Does > it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just die? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Static route from our router to the ePMP RF IP. RF IP is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DHCP, tried static. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't see the routing table on the SM....augh..... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, George Skorup > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you assigning it an IP on the wireless/WAN side? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a default route thing? And then an upstream route > back to the LAN side > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the SM? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NAT works on like 98% of our customers. Bridge works on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the other 2%. Router mode didn't seem to do it's job. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. Unless you mean NAT. I messed with NAT. Unexplained > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latency issues, so I switched that customer back to > bridge. The first one I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tried. Of course that was a couple releases ago. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 10:38 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone used this? Doesn't seem to be working for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >
