Care to explain?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Issue on my end! Works perfectly fine if you do it right. These aren't the > droids you're looking for, move along... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I almost set one up that way last week, but decided to just put it in >> bridge mode with a Mikrotik behind it instead... apparently that was a good >> decision. >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Josh Luthman >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ...yup :) >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:58 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ahh OK. Got ya. Basic router mode doesn't work? That's weird. >>>> >>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:53 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Maybe the first one? Don't want the other two. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:48 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think you understand how English works. >>>>>> >>>>>> Go back and read what you wrote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe I'm not understanding the situation, but it sounds like they're >>>>>> simply not enabling one or more of: IP forwarding, NAT module, connection >>>>>> tracking. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:41 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Imagine a mikrotik defaulted. IP on wlan1 and IP on eth1. That, no >>>>>>> firewall srcnat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:37 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What? What your saying doesn't make any sense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:34 AM, "Josh Luthman" >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yup >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:22 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Masquerade is s-nat.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:21 AM, "Josh Luthman" >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Basically NAT with the masquerade off. I'm going to lab and work >>>>>>>>>>> with Cambium here in a bit. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:10 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies. Looks like we are just using the NAT mode not router >>>>>>>>>>>> mode.. I just didn't realize it for whatever reason. I've got a >>>>>>>>>>>> lab setup >>>>>>>>>>>> for EPMP I can play with.. what are you trying to accomplish? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:36 AM, "Josh Luthman" >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.6.2? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:44 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It works as expected here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 21, 2016 11:40 PM, "Josh Luthman" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the outside world to the LAN IP nothing. From my house >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (the same /23 of publics) it does ping. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the wired side of the epmp radio I could not ping the RF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface IP. Or anything farther away. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:33 AM, George Skorup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about a traceroute from upstream to the SM LAN? Does it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just die? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Static route from our router to the ePMP RF IP. RF IP is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DHCP, tried static. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't see the routing table on the SM....augh..... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, George Skorup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you assigning it an IP on the wireless/WAN side? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a default route thing? And then an upstream route back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the LAN side >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the SM? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NAT works on like 98% of our customers. Bridge works on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the other 2%. Router mode didn't seem to do it's job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. Unless you mean NAT. I messed with NAT. Unexplained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latency issues, so I switched that customer back to bridge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The first one I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tried. Of course that was a couple releases ago. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 10:38 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone used this? Doesn't seem to be working for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
