I can and did :). There's netstat tcpdump ifconfig but no route print!!!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 22, 2016 1:15 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:

> But... you can still yell at Cambium for not showing the routing table.
> Just sayin.
>
> On 6/22/2016 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> We typically do an RB750 demarc to our customers.  When we put this in we
> do OSPF on it and put the customer's /29 (or whatever) on the customer face
> port.  When that port gets link, it advertises the customer /29 to the rest
> of our network.
>
> In this case I created a static route on the BMU (Powercode router) to the
> customer's ePMP SM.  I had previously thought that the entire public range
> was routed to the BMU (it wasn't, it learns via OSPF).  This means the
> outside world would get to our core BGP router and it wouldn't know where
> to go.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Care to explain?
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Josh Luthman
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Issue on my end!  Works perfectly fine if you do it right.  These
>> aren't the
>> > droids you're looking for, move along...
>> >
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I almost set one up that way last week, but decided to just put it in
>> >> bridge mode with a Mikrotik behind it instead... apparently that was a
>> good
>> >> decision.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Josh Luthman
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> ...yup :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Josh Luthman
>> >>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>> Suite 1337
>> >>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:58 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ahh OK. Got ya. Basic router mode doesn't work? That's weird.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:53 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]
>> >
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maybe the first one?  Don't want the other two.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:48 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I don't think you understand how English works.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Go back and read what you wrote.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Maybe I'm not understanding the situation, but it sounds like
>> they're
>> >>>>>> simply not enabling one or more of: IP forwarding, NAT module,
>> connection
>> >>>>>> tracking.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:41 AM, "Josh Luthman" <
>> [email protected]>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Imagine a mikrotik defaulted.  IP on wlan1 and IP on eth1.  That,
>> no
>> >>>>>>> firewall srcnat.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:37 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> What? What your saying doesn't make any sense.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:34 AM, "Josh Luthman"
>> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Yup
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:22 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Masquerade is s-nat....
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 8:21 AM, "Josh Luthman"
>> >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Basically NAT with the masquerade off.  I'm going to lab and
>> work
>> >>>>>>>>>>> with Cambium here in a bit.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 9:10 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies. Looks like we are just using the NAT mode not
>> router
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> mode.. I just didn't realize it for whatever reason. I've
>> got a lab setup
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for EPMP I can play with.. what are you trying to accomplish?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:36 AM, "Josh Luthman"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.6.2?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2016 7:44 AM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It works as expected here.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 21, 2016 11:40 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the outside world to the LAN IP nothing.  From my
>> house
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (the same /23 of publics) it does ping.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the wired side of the epmp radio I could not ping
>> the RF
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface IP.  Or anything farther away.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:33 AM, George Skorup
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about a traceroute from upstream to the SM LAN?
>> Does it
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just die?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Static route from our router to the ePMP RF IP.  RF IP is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DHCP, tried static.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't see the routing table on the SM....augh.....
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, George Skorup
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you assigning it an IP on the wireless/WAN side?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a default route thing? And then an upstream route
>> back to the LAN side
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the SM?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 11:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NAT works on like 98% of our customers.  Bridge works on
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the other 2%.  Router mode didn't seem to do it's job.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. Unless you mean NAT. I messed with NAT. Unexplained
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latency issues, so I switched that customer back to
>> bridge. The first one I
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tried. Of course that was a couple releases ago.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2016 10:38 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone used this?  Doesn't seem to be working for
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to