damn them!

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The Chinese actually dug tunnels under Rio Grande from Juarez to El Paso
> after we banned them from entering US once they finished railroads..   The
> Rio Grande was faster and deeper then before they built several damns in
> New Mexico.
>
> On Jul 27, 2016 2:27 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oh hell... you heard it here first folks.  That sounds super easy.  Put
>> an HDD in someone’s garage, bore and have it come up in a building on the
>> other side.  Who would ever know.
>>
>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2016 2:24 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] international MW Links?
>>
>> now that I think about it, if you were a contractor running international
>> duct, dropping a second duct could be super beneficial. Liquefy the cocaine
>> in mexico, pump it to the US. Im goina go buy a ditchwitch
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:19 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> dont jest, he might see how luctrative it is to control border data. May
>>> be a new black market to run dark fiber through the drug tunnels though.
>>> "Sorry el jefe, there was no room left in the tunnel for the cocaine, it
>>> was filled with orange tubes"
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe Trump can get Mexico to build that into the wall too?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 27, 2016, at 1:52 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure they didn't intentionally transmit data on those links either.
>>>> I'm calling for a border faraday cage!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>

Reply via email to