Cisco 9001

-----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NAT64

Possibly :) What gear are you using now for edge / transport / access routers?

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
You wanna come to Utah for a few days and show us how?

-----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NAT64

Do IPv6 native and CGNAT for IPv4. If you use port block allocation,
you will always know what sub(s) are getting complained about with
torrent complaints :P

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

Still searching for a good solution to go IPV6 only with the subs.  Takes
a
pretty expensive piece of hardware at the core router to do NAT64 in a
carrier class manner.  If anyone has suggestions I am anxious to learn.



Reply via email to