https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-3s/nat-xe-3s-book/iadnat-bpa.html
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > Cisco 9001 > > -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NAT64 > > Possibly :) What gear are you using now for edge / transport / access > routers? > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You wanna come to Utah for a few days and show us how? >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:24 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NAT64 >> >> Do IPv6 native and CGNAT for IPv4. If you use port block allocation, >> you will always know what sub(s) are getting complained about with >> torrent complaints :P >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Still searching for a good solution to go IPV6 only with the subs. Takes >>> a >>> pretty expensive piece of hardware at the core router to do NAT64 in a >>> carrier class manner. If anyone has suggestions I am anxious to learn. >> >> >> >
