has anyone actually deployed these? we ended up opting to not go with them for this round of EPMP deployments because it sounds too much like unicorns farting butterflies
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > The 90*? It's been posted a bunch of times. There's really no other > possibility for that product anyway - 120 can't (won't?) do frequency reuse. > > I'm not 100% on the number of beams. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That's the same spec sheet I was just looking at. No gain or beamwidth >> on there. Did you hear your info verbally perhaps? >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Sent: 8/8/2016 12:23:18 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP beam forming antenna >> >> >> 90* overall and I think 7x 13* individual? >> >> Dimensions are here http://www.doubleradius.c >> om/site/stores/cambium/Cambium-ePMP-2000-Smart-Antenna-datasheet.pdf >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I was noticing the spec sheet for the new ePMP 2000 beam forming antenna >>> does not mention gain, nor does it mention beamwidth. What's the deal with >>> that? >>> >>> Wind load is also not on the spec sheet, nor the polar plot of radiation >>> pattern, but nominal gain and beamwidth would be a good place to start. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
