Worst case you deploy the ePMP 2000 radio on the new sector and then you add the receive beamforming antenna when you're ready to take a drink. The better antenna and radio is ~$100 more than the existing setup.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 2:44:34 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP beam forming antenna has anyone actually deployed these? we ended up opting to not go with them for this round of EPMP deployments because it sounds too much like unicorns farting butterflies On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Josh Luthman < [email protected] > wrote: The 90*? It's been posted a bunch of times. There's really no other possibility for that product anyway - 120 can't (won't?) do frequency reuse. I'm not 100% on the number of beams. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Adam Moffett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> That's the same spec sheet I was just looking at. No gain or beamwidth on there. Did you hear your info verbally perhaps? ------ Original Message ------ From: "Josh Luthman" < [email protected] > To: " [email protected] " < [email protected] > Sent: 8/8/2016 12:23:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP beam forming antenna <blockquote> 90* overall and I think 7x 13* individual? Dimensions are here http://www.doubleradius.com/site/stores/cambium/Cambium-ePMP-2000-Smart-Antenna-datasheet.pdf Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Adam Moffett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I was noticing the spec sheet for the new ePMP 2000 beam forming antenna does not mention gain, nor does it mention beamwidth. What's the deal with that? Wind load is also not on the spec sheet, nor the polar plot of radiation pattern, but nominal gain and beamwidth would be a good place to start. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
