Joe's network is the case study Cambium has put out. 

Do you have ones without the receive antenna in the more suburban parts of your 
network? Okay without or does it need it? I'm looking to add some sectors to 
that Oswego tower that we shared and contemplating the base setup or going all 
out. If you don't remember, the interference at that site is -70 to -75. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Joe Falaschi" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 5:49:16 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP beam forming antenna 

We have maybe about 8 EPMP 2000 radios deployed. I think only three have the 
beam steer antenna on them. All new deployments that would have been 1000 are 
now 2000 because of the filtering and the ability to bolt on the beam steer 
antenna if needed later. Between elevation and azimuth, I think the system can 
choose from 1 out of 256 ways to form a beam at each time slot. I could have 
that wrong but I remember it being a larger number than I was expecting. 


Joe Falaschi 
e-vergent 








On Aug 8, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 


Worst case you deploy the ePMP 2000 radio on the new sector and then you add 
the receive beamforming antenna when you're ready to take a drink. The better 
antenna and radio is ~$100 more than the existing setup. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 2:44:34 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP beam forming antenna 


has anyone actually deployed these? we ended up opting to not go with them for 
this round of EPMP deployments because it sounds too much like unicorns farting 
butterflies 




On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Josh Luthman < [email protected] > 
wrote: 

<blockquote>

The 90*? It's been posted a bunch of times. There's really no other possibility 
for that product anyway - 120 can't (won't?) do frequency reuse. 


I'm not 100% on the number of beams. 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Adam Moffett < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


That's the same spec sheet I was just looking at. No gain or beamwidth on 
there. Did you hear your info verbally perhaps? 




------ Original Message ------ 
From: "Josh Luthman" < [email protected] > 
To: " [email protected] " < [email protected] > 
Sent: 8/8/2016 12:23:18 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP beam forming antenna 


<blockquote>

90* overall and I think 7x 13* individual? 


Dimensions are here 
http://www.doubleradius.com/site/stores/cambium/Cambium-ePMP-2000-Smart-Antenna-datasheet.pdf
 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Adam Moffett < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


I was noticing the spec sheet for the new ePMP 2000 beam forming antenna does 
not mention gain, nor does it mention beamwidth. What's the deal with that? 

Wind load is also not on the spec sheet, nor the polar plot of radiation 
pattern, but nominal gain and beamwidth would be a good place to start. 





</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>




-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>


Reply via email to