This x100. Plus most small to medium sized WISPs need to worry more about their upstream getting saturated by a DDoS than their routers being able to handle the bandwidth once it gets to them.
Chris Wright Network Administrator From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 7:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] suggestions for WISP headend Mikrotik Sure you can ☺ configuration is key. Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/> Office: 314-735-0270 E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Erich Kaiser Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:48 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] suggestions for WISP headend Mikrotik Can you survive a DDOS with these? My past experience is that is a NO, LOL, thats why I was asking about x86. Thinking we may give them 10G uplink and then they can do 1G to their transport, so they can limit their networks for DDOS protection. Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Not as far as I know. Look at routerboard.com at Interfaces. There is only a SFP 1G Copper Interface. The direct link cables look to thick and cheap for fiber. Maybe this is copper. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Im Auftrag von Josh Luthman Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 15:23 An: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] suggestions for WISP headend Mikrotik They make SFP+ with copper don't they? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 6, 2016 9:21 AM, "Steve" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We are using several CCR1036-8G-2S+ units and they are awesome. The day is coming though eventually when we will need something with a few more SFP+ ports but by then hopefully there will be something new. There is an 8 port SPF+ router but we also need some with Ethernet cables as well. Also 10GbE ports would be nice too. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 3:01:48 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] suggestions for WISP headend Mikrotik We are happy with CCR1036-8G-2S+EM. In a redundant scenario you could connect 2 with a 10G SFP+ direct attach cable and there is one 10G Port left. Lot of power for VPLS concentrator or PPPOE Server. We use 2 of them for BGP Uplink. Another concentrates VPLS Tunnels and does PPPOE. Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Im Auftrag von Erich Kaiser Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 02:26 An: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Betreff: [AFMUG] suggestions for WISP headend Mikrotik I have a couple guys wanting to put headend routers in our colo at Cermak, just wondering what guys are using in relation to hardware for Mikrotik? Several 1G ports with option for 10G. I know they can go x86, but want to know what is the best hardware for this? Thanks! Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Office: 630-621-4804<tel:630-621-4804> Cell: 630-777-9291<tel:630-777-9291>
