Whoops. Missed that important detail. A -50 dBm noise floor is pretty much a impossible situation.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 10/28/2016 1:28 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
a blind AP is a blind AP no matter how you cut it, if the interference is coming in from the same direction as the sm, not alot you can do. with -50 floor that sector is effectively not there. can you go lower with the sector and hope ground clutter will mitigate the campus interference to a point you can get a reasonable snr. compared to what you have right now hin dropping to a -70 if you can get clutter to -80 is better, but if thats the floor, youre better served to get a tight shielded directional antenna rather than a sector and do ptp

beamsteering is focusing energy at the subscriber more than anything isnt it?

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    If the interference is on the subscriber end, it should affect the
    downstream traffic. Interference on the AP side (which you don't
    seem to be having) would affect he upstream.

    Something else is going on.


    bp
    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>


    On 10/28/2016 1:02 PM, Nate Burke wrote:

        So the EPMP2000 with beam steering on the upstream side.  If
        you have a customer that is in line with the source of the
        Interference, they're still hosed right?  The AP still wont'
        be able to hear them over the noise.

        I have a EPMP sector with a single customer on it and the AP
        is running about -50 noise across the entire band (5.1 and
        5.7)  I think the source of the interference is a close by
        corporate campus that's probably flooded with 5ghz wifi, and
        this customer is directly in between the tower and the
        campus.  I can only get MCS level 1 on the upstream side with
        a receive level of -48. EPMP2000 would have no effect in this
        scenario, right?





--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to