Remember that the path analysis involves frequency, xmt power, rcv sensitivity, antenna gain, and the rest is the RF path itself. I think you might be focusing too much on the equipment. If the numbers don’t add up, the equipment will probably have only incremental effect on the results.
It’s like hoping to find the magic golf clubs that will turn you from a 20 handicap golfer into a scratch golfer. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Regan Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP 60 miles 400Mbps 8ft dishes that's a problem. On one side it need to be on top of the 300ft tower. On Oct 31, 2016 10:05 PM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: SAF intergra with 60 ghz channels and some nice 8 ft dishes On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Charles Regan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: 400Mbps in one direction. On Oct 31, 2016 9:52 PM, "David Milholen" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: IS 400Mbs in one direction or both or aggregate? Budget is an issue for that size pipe one way for sure. PTP820C 1+0 may do it at 6Ghz Spatial diversity for sure but pricing has you. On 10/31/2016 7:10 PM, Charles Regan wrote: Hello everyone, What would you guys use for a 60 miles PTP link? 400Mbps. Oh and it's over seawater... 20k$ budget. SAF, Trango both said sorry, can't do. Mimosa B5C with space diversity and 3k$ maybe. We do have a working AF5x with a 34dbi dish doing 150Mbps aggregate. The link gets bad sometimes because of ducting/reflection. How could I use two parabolics dish on different polarity with the AF5x for space diversity? Splitter? Should a B5C perform better or worse ? Charles --
