Nothing in my mind. It's one of the things that would make it "better".
But I still think single payer (ala medicare) would be better.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/10/2016 11:21 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
so what is so bad about opening this up across state lines?
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Jay Weekley <mailto:[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:18 PM
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Logistics
Just for fun I ran the numbers from Las Vegas using Healthcare.gov
and
rates were a lot cheaper. Probably due to the fact there are 3
companies available.
Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> Same thing is happening up in Alaska.
>
>
> On Nov 10, 2016 11:52 AM, "Jerry Head"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Single provider only here in Alabama.
> My policy is going to triple for 2017.
> Bleh.
>
> On 11/10/2016 11:10 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> That's the number that I hear quoted. If you have a
reputable
> different number, then we can talk about that.
>
> It's reported to be going up here by about 5%. It's going up
> more in some other states. None the less, the overall
increase
> in the last 5 or 6 years is still less than what was
forecast.
>
> The numbers need context.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 11/10/2016 9:02 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Are you *SURE* 22M people have insurance now that didn't
> before?
>
> If there are 22M more people paying for insurance,
why is
> the cost going up? Is it a scare resource now in higher
> demand?
>
>
>
