Yup so true… you go from just being a man to being a gentleman at that point ;)


> On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:26 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> OK, but you will have to turn in your man card if you do.
>  
> From: Kurt Fankhauser <>
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:47 AM
> To: [email protected] <>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - Microsoft scratch-off COA
>  
> I'm seriously considering buying an Apple notebook for my next PC.Getting 
> tired of Microsoft and all their shenanigans.
>  
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:20 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
> <[email protected] <>> wrote:
>> i think there is a guy at microsoft just solely dedicated to coming up with 
>> newer and better ways for them to be dicks. He was on an extended vacation 
>> after he got his massive bonus check for the licensing audit program. Then 
>> he came up with windows 10 licensing where its either hardware bound in the 
>> ether, or tied to your personal microsoft account, assuming you were the 
>> first guy to log in post upgrade, or maybe your reseller account, or hey, 
>> maybe its your COA, or its an OEM that may be bound to a COA key, or 
>> hardware bound.
>> that guy is fa freaking champ
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <>> wrote:
>>> Apparently starting a few months back, Microsoft in their infinite wisdom 
>>> decided to cover part of the Product Key on their COA stickers with a 
>>> silver label and the word Microsoft.  Turns out you scratch it off like a 
>>> lottery ticket, but they neglect to tell you this.  So I ended up calling 
>>> tech support to see if I was supposed to peel off the silver label and the 
>>> guy had no idea what I was talking about.  As soon as I tried to peel a 
>>> corner with my fingernail, I realized it was scratch-off not a label.
>>>  
>>> Only an issue if you get box software with a COA sticker, I assume not an 
>>> issue with volume licensing.
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> -- 
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
>> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
> 
>  

Reply via email to