yet being operative playstation will make the plunge and then others will too
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:19 AM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not just nat/cgnat at that point? are we even going to see 100% ipv6 > in our life time? > > $10 a sub to buy a ipv4 isn't really that expensive anyway... > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Wonder if I could offer an “IPv6-Only” type of account at a discounted >> rate. >> They'd get their Netflix, their Facebook and everything else that’s v6 >> reachable. >> If they can’t get to a v4 only site/service, then they can be the vocal >> ones complaining to the site owners to get their act in gear. >> >> >> On Nov 12, 2016, at 10:47 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Except that you literally cannot ‘move to IPv6’ and have happy clients >> yet. >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser >> *Sent:* Saturday, November 12, 2016 7:17 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives? >> >> Wow, didn't know that /24's were going for that high. I would move to >> IPv6 as fast as I can! >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> That's actually a pretty good price. >> >> On Nov 11, 2016 6:42 PM, "Dev" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are there any other alternatives than the ipv4auctions.com style >> websites, which seem like highway robbery at $3584 current bid for a /24? >> >> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
