Oh there's a literal minefield of issues across the whole landscape, to be sure :(
Imagine the pre-802.11n / draft-802.11n days? Imagine this be much worse. It's the protocols, kernel handling, application handling, vendor support, etc. On Nov 13, 2016 10:54 AM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > Josh, I don't disagree with you, but didn't we have this discussion a > couple weeks ago? I remember something about issues with DNS64 not quite > working as expected. > > On 11/13/2016 10:49 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > *facepalm* I guess I have to spell it out. > > Run ipv6 internal with NAT64 and DNS64. Or DSLite, or just simply > dualstack with NAT444 aka CGNAT. > > We will have need for some ipv4 for the foreseeable future. > > Nothing is stopping you from running a fully ipv6 internal network > assuming you have the proper translation layers in place at either edge > (customer edge or transit edge). > > On Nov 13, 2016 10:40 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What do you think the 4 stands for in NAT64? You cannot access IPv4 >> resources with IPv4 addresses, even if you use IPv6 everywhere. >> >> Jared >> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 5:59 PM >> From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives? >> NAT64 >> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAT64 >> >> >> On Nov 13, 2016 9:54 AM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected][mailto:chuck@ >> wbmfg.com]> wrote: >> >> Nope, not if you are v6 and only v6. No way to get to bazillions of >> servers that are on v4 still and will be for many moons. >> You will have to have V4 involved somewhere forever. >> >> >> >> From: Josh Reynolds >> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 1:32 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives? >> >> Of course you can. There's many ways to go about it. >> >> >> On Nov 12, 2016 11:47 PM, "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Except that you literally cannot ‘move to IPv6’ and have happy clients >> yet. >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser >> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 7:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives? >> >> >> Wow, didn't know that /24's were going for that high. I would move to >> IPv6 as fast as I can! >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> That's actually a pretty good price. >> >> >> >> On Nov 11, 2016 6:42 PM, "Dev" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are there any other alternatives than the ipv4auctions.com[http://ipv4au >> ctions.com] style websites, which seem like highway robbery at $3584 >> current bid for a /24? >> >> > >
