Josh, I don't disagree with you, but didn't we have this discussion a
couple weeks ago? I remember something about issues with DNS64 not quite
working as expected.
On 11/13/2016 10:49 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
*facepalm* I guess I have to spell it out.
Run ipv6 internal with NAT64 and DNS64. Or DSLite, or just simply
dualstack with NAT444 aka CGNAT.
We will have need for some ipv4 for the foreseeable future.
Nothing is stopping you from running a fully ipv6 internal network
assuming you have the proper translation layers in place at either
edge (customer edge or transit edge).
On Nov 13, 2016 10:40 AM, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What do you think the 4 stands for in NAT64? You cannot access
IPv4 resources with IPv4 addresses, even if you use IPv6 everywhere.
Jared
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 5:59 PM
From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives?
NAT64
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAT64
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAT64>
On Nov 13, 2016 9:54 AM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>]> wrote:
Nope, not if you are v6 and only v6. No way to get to bazillions
of servers that are on v4 still and will be for many moons.
You will have to have V4 involved somewhere forever.
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 1:32 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives?
Of course you can. There's many ways to go about it.
On Nov 12, 2016 11:47 PM, "Sterling Jacobson"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Except that you literally cannot ‘move to IPv6’ and have happy
clients yet.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 7:17 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives?
Wow, didn't know that /24's were going for that high. I would move
to IPv6 as fast as I can!
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That's actually a pretty good price.
On Nov 11, 2016 6:42 PM, "Dev" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Are there any other alternatives than the ipv4auctions.com
<http://ipv4auctions.com>[http://ipv4auctions.com
<http://ipv4auctions.com>] style websites, which seem like highway
robbery at $3584 current bid for a /24?
