hey gino, we are waiting for the FCC to approve the DFS band before we move clients to the 450m's. We had to get them on the tower and alive tho because it's about to be snow season and one tower is at the top of the ski area, the other tower is across the valley.
I'll report more once we have clients attached. right now i don't have much to say other than they are powered on and have sync ;-) -sean On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > So what has been the experience with the 450M? > > From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us > > > Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 8:17 PM > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing > > So interesting story here...we have three 450m's in the air and they are > getting sync over power from a packetflux gigabit sync injector & timing > over timing port via a packetflux sync injector 12. > > Old style sync seems to work just fine on the 450m. > > -Sean > > > > *Gino Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:06 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Based on what others have said, I think it is all part of the "Precision >> Timing Protocol", it is an IP-based way of distributing timing information. >> Look up IEEE 1588-2008, or Precision Timing Protocol Version 2. >> >> No more timing pulses. >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 3:03 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Well, sending a pulse sounds like AM to me. Perhaps level shifting would >> be a better term to use. >> >> *From:* Daniel White >> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 3:40 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing >> >> Something completely new. >> >> Instead of interrupting power, they are sending a “pulse” of power per >> sync pulse. I don’t recall the details on it at this point. >> >> CMM5 FYI is looking like December availability now. >> >> Daniel White >> Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales >> ConVergence Technologies >> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 >> dwh...@converge-tech.com >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup >> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 12:40 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing >> >> So.. is "Cambium Sync" still a power interruption scheme or something >> completely new? I thought the thing they were going to move to was 1588v2? >> On 11/15/2016 1:26 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: >> >> I guess I need to be more clear on this. .. >> There are two types of sync over power. >> The first is being called Canopy sync, which is compatible with the >> 450i and earlier radios. >> The second is being called Cambium sync and is compatible with the 450M >> and I'm guessing later radios. >> Currently there are devices that produce the cambium sync pulse... The >> CMM5 and I'm about 100% certain that Last Mile Gear has one as well. I >> have the technical information I need, just haven't had a chance to get >> the circuit designed (I only received it shortly before wispapalooza), let >> alone tested. >> >> On Nov 14, 2016 7:52 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < >> li...@packetflux.com> wrote: >> >> No, Cambium elected to drop the traditional sync over power on the 450M. >> So, you either need to use timing port sync (via the aux port) or use >> what they're calling cambium sync. >> The 1U injector is very close. I need to finish validation on the latest >> board revisions and then will be releasing it to production assuming there >> isn't some showstopper I missed. >> >> On Nov 14, 2016 7:34 PM, "Matt" <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Shouldn't the sync over power for the 450M be the same as PMP450i? >> >> How is the 1u sync injector coming? >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) >> <li...@packetflux.com> wrote: >> > All of the currently shipping syncbox product line are compatible. For >> sync >> > over power, I have the specs, but the design isn't done yet. >> > >> > >> > On Nov 14, 2016 5:40 PM, "Sam Lambie" <samtaos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> A question for Forrest mostly. Have you come up with a timing product >> for >> >> the 450m AP yet? If not, have you got a timeline for release? >> >> >> >> Sam >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> >> Sam Lambie >> >> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >> >> 575-758-7598 Office >> >> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.taosnet.com/> >> >> >> >> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> >> Virus-free. >> www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link> >> >> >>
