For the record, http://store.packetflux.com/powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version/ says: 1A per port maximum power. (48 watts at 48 Volts)

So.. is the electronic over-current protection the 1A limit? Or is this just outdated info? Pretty sure it's >1A because I've "tested" it (cable leaking water into the GigE-APC, the port didn't trip, and the card was hot as hell).

I was also unaware that Cambium won't be supporting sync-over-power on the 450m. I imagine the ringing/bounce issue killed that idea due to the high power consumption.

On 11/14/2016 1:00 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:

The current products should power the 450M just fine. The rating is 1A per pair per port, so at the 48V you're good up to 96W.


On Nov 14, 2016 7:50 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    The 450m pulls 70 watts. The current
    SyncInjector/PowerInjector+Sync is around 1A max per port. What
    you could do for now is a GigE-POE-APC and the new aux port
    version SyncBox Junior.


    On 11/14/2016 12:34 PM, Matt wrote:

        Shouldn't the sync over power for the 450M be the same as PMP450i?

        How is the 1u sync injector coming?


        On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account)
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            All of the currently shipping syncbox product line are
            compatible.  For sync
            over power, I have the specs, but the design isn't done yet.


            On Nov 14, 2016 5:40 PM, "Sam Lambie"
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                A question for Forrest mostly. Have you come up with a
                timing product for
                the 450m AP yet? If not, have you got a timeline for
                release?

                Sam

                --
                --
                Sam Lambie
                Taosnet Wireless Tech.
                575-758-7598 <tel:575-758-7598> Office
                www.Taosnet.com <http://www.Taosnet.com>




Reply via email to