My personal preference would be not to exceed .75A per pair because that matches the official cat5 ratings.
On Nov 14, 2016 8:03 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > And, even though you will exceed published ratings, you can go to 1.5 amps > per port without saturating the cores of the transformer. > It will get hot, but not hot enough to unsolder itself. > > *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account) > *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2016 12:00 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing > > > The current products should power the 450M just fine. The rating is 1A > per pair per port, so at the 48V you're good up to 96W. > > On Nov 14, 2016 7:50 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The 450m pulls 70 watts. The current SyncInjector/PowerInjector+Sync is > around 1A max per port. What you could do for now is a GigE-POE-APC and the > new aux port version SyncBox Junior. > > > On 11/14/2016 12:34 PM, Matt wrote: > >> Shouldn't the sync over power for the 450M be the same as PMP450i? >> >> How is the 1u sync injector coming? >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> All of the currently shipping syncbox product line are compatible. For >>> sync >>> over power, I have the specs, but the design isn't done yet. >>> >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2016 5:40 PM, "Sam Lambie" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> A question for Forrest mostly. Have you come up with a timing product >>>> for >>>> the 450m AP yet? If not, have you got a timeline for release? >>>> >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Sam Lambie >>>> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>>> 575-758-7598 Office >>>> www.Taosnet.com >>>> >>> > >
