Still the issue of 2.4 EPMP does not seem to penetrate as well as UBNT - at
least from my field guys.
I know there was some serious discussion on this once upon a time.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Langeler
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
I want to know the throughput comparisons? EPMP vs UBNT now?
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Nov 30, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's not a bad deal at all. We have several towers where we put up both
UBNT and ePMP 5ghz APs, with the intention of eventually replacing all the UBNT
CPE with ePMP and shutting down the old AP - this is going to save us a ton of
time and money.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:40 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
35 bucks a pop to extend a depreciated hardware is not a bad deal at all
they just said if you have a failed AP, theyll honor system your licenses
to an existing AP you have so you dont have to wait on RMA
Im beginning to wonder about Cambium, theyre building EPMP into a really
hot product that is good enough to compete with the 450 in the margin markets
Is this the same Cambium that bought moto, or has there been a
restructuring? Because originally, they were bigger cocks than moto
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com>
wrote:
Mikrotik?
On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by
shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this
might give us a better window
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is
compatible with an Intel Core isn't it?
Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as
the oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW.
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy
/sarcasm
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus
wallace and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt
managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was
when I signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com>
wrote:
I prefer the Cambium direct link:
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/
Very interesting indeed... very interesting.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat
<tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> wrote:
This ought to shake things up a bit.
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/
/
www.businesswire.com
/
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
