this is actually a grand opportunity, since the ubnt AP will still be live and visible (i think) in the in the monitor - wireless, a direct software interpretation comparison wanna bet the noise floor isnt -93 or -91 on every unit anymore. I always wondered if the noise floor is just a random choice generator between those two numbers
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > At least part of it seems to be differences in how they calculate signal > levels. It will be interesting to compare a Force 200 and a PowerBeam > running the same software. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Still the issue of 2.4 EPMP does not seem to penetrate as well as UBNT - >> at least from my field guys. >> I know there was some serious discussion on this once upon a time. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Jon Langeler <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:16 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >> >> I want to know the throughput comparisons? EPMP vs UBNT now? >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Nov 30, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It's not a bad deal at all. We have several towers where we put up both >> UBNT and ePMP 5ghz APs, with the intention of eventually replacing all the >> UBNT CPE with ePMP and shutting down the old AP - this is going to save us >> a ton of time and money. >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:40 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 35 bucks a pop to extend a depreciated hardware is not a bad deal at all >>> >>> they just said if you have a failed AP, theyll honor system your >>> licenses to an existing AP you have so you dont have to wait on RMA >>> >>> Im beginning to wonder about Cambium, theyre building EPMP into a really >>> hot product that is good enough to compete with the 450 in the margin >>> markets >>> >>> Is this the same Cambium that bought moto, or has there been a >>> restructuring? Because originally, they were bigger cocks than moto >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Mikrotik? >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, >>>>> this >>>>> might give us a better window >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is >>>>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same >>>>>> SW. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One >>>>>> Guy /sarcasm >>>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>>> access >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>> >>>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>>> >>>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>>> >>>>>> / >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
