2.4ghz PMP450 penetrates better than UBNT 2.4. Don't know if its the slant polarization helping or what.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected] > wrote: > > Still the issue of 2.4 EPMP does not seem to penetrate as well as UBNT - > at least from my field guys. > I know there was some serious discussion on this once upon a time. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jon Langeler <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:16 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > I want to know the throughput comparisons? EPMP vs UBNT now? > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's not a bad deal at all. We have several towers where we put up both > UBNT and ePMP 5ghz APs, with the intention of eventually replacing all the > UBNT CPE with ePMP and shutting down the old AP - this is going to save us > a ton of time and money. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:40 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 35 bucks a pop to extend a depreciated hardware is not a bad deal at all >> >> they just said if you have a failed AP, theyll honor system your licenses >> to an existing AP you have so you dont have to wait on RMA >> >> Im beginning to wonder about Cambium, theyre building EPMP into a really >> hot product that is good enough to compete with the 450 in the margin >> markets >> >> Is this the same Cambium that bought moto, or has there been a >> restructuring? Because originally, they were bigger cocks than moto >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jason Wilson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Mikrotik? >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by >>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this >>>> might give us a better window >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is >>>>> compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware >>>>> access >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>> >>>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>>> >>>>> www.businesswire.com >>>>> >>>>> / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > >
