why is cnmaestro trying to put RC on our radios?

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> 3.2.1 was just released... I think it's supposed to fix that.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Uhhmm...you're probably going to have DFS issues on 3.x
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:03 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Nope. P9 5.7 APs do not support SM Tx power control. We're just going to
>>> go to an ePMP 2000 AP and pray that we don't have DFS issues on 3.x.
>>>
>>> On 1/4/2017 1:37 PM, Dave wrote:
>>>
>>> FSK is going to be hard to colo due to the fact you mentioned but you
>>> should be able to upgrade to fsk latest FW and
>>> get what u need for ATPC
>>> Also, Look at you epmp for latest FW for it to also have some more
>>> control over ATPC
>>> You also may need to adj the level at which the ATPC will adjust to.
>>> Being that close I would set it lower from -57 to more like -67 or so
>>> and do the same for both fsk and epmp.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/03/2017 02:44 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>>
>>> First time I've tried this. I have a site with two 5750APs. They are
>>> quite obviously overloading the receiver on the ePMP GPS AP. Put numbers in
>>> the co-lo spreadsheet, timing checks out. Running the ePMP in the 5.4 band.
>>> Still works for shit.
>>>
>>> This is a very compact micro-pop, so we have SMs within 50-100 feet of
>>> the tower. I'm betting the SM uplinks are interfering with the ePMP AP. And
>>> I get no SM Tx power control on the Canopy's because the APs are P9's.
>>> Probably gonna have to go to an ePMP 2000 AP. Ugh. I would put 450 there,
>>> but the boss said no, the SMs are too expensive.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to