Saw that. Hope it works.

On 1/4/2017 2:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
3.2.1 was just released... I think it's supposed to fix that.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Uhhmm...you're probably going to have DFS issues on 3.x


    Josh Luthman
    Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
    Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
    1100 Wayne St
    Suite 1337
    Troy, OH 45373

    On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:03 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Nope. P9 5.7 APs do not support SM Tx power control. We're
        just going to go to an ePMP 2000 AP and pray that we don't
        have DFS issues on 3.x.

        On 1/4/2017 1:37 PM, Dave wrote:
        FSK is going to be hard to colo due to the fact you mentioned
        but you should be able to upgrade to fsk latest FW and
        get what u need for ATPC
        Also, Look at you epmp for latest FW for it to also have some
        more control over ATPC
        You also may need to adj the level at which the ATPC will
        adjust to.
        Being that close I would set it lower from -57 to more like
        -67 or so and do the same for both fsk and epmp.



        On 01/03/2017 02:44 PM, George Skorup wrote:
        First time I've tried this. I have a site with two 5750APs.
        They are quite obviously overloading the receiver on the
        ePMP GPS AP. Put numbers in the co-lo spreadsheet, timing
        checks out. Running the ePMP in the 5.4 band. Still works
        for shit.

        This is a very compact micro-pop, so we have SMs within
        50-100 feet of the tower. I'm betting the SM uplinks are
        interfering with the ePMP AP. And I get no SM Tx power
        control on the Canopy's because the APs are P9's. Probably
        gonna have to go to an ePMP 2000 AP. Ugh. I would put 450
        there, but the boss said no, the SMs are too expensive.

--




Reply via email to