Very close. I hope to have a better answer later this week (I'm verifying what I hope to be the final board revisions - the real answer will be related to what I find)
On Jan 9, 2017 11:18 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > What’s the latest status on this item? > > > > Will we know the ETA when it appears in the Packetflux store, or are you > taking some sort of pre-orders? > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian > (List Account) > *Sent:* Thursday, December 8, 2016 10:26 PM > *To:* af <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux 1U SyncInjector > > > > It's 8" nominal in depth (Haven't measured it exactly so it might be a bit > over/under). > > > > We're working through all of the final integration, manufacturing, > testing, etc. Still hoping for final release to manufacturing by the end > of the year, but it's starting to look a bit tighter than I'd like to make > that schedule. > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > What will the dimensions be of the unit? Any ETA yet? > > Wandering if it will fit in this: > https://www.startech.com/Server-Management/Racks/1U- > 19in-Hinged-Wall-Mounting-Bracket-for-Patch-Panels~WALLMOUNTH1 > > 24 Port Mikrotik CRS seems to fit in it. > > Most cases I plan to rack mount but a few cases I do not have that > option and must use a hoffman box. Shoving a CRS and this unit right > next to each other will really save room in a box when we don't rack > mount. > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The chassis will support up to 16 ports of injection. Each 4 ports are > on a > > separate card which can be populated or not, so you can buy it with 4, > 8, 12 > > or 16 ports - and then upgrade later by adding cards. > > > > The initially available cards will not support the new style cambium > sync. > > I considered holding this product for that feature but decided against it > > since it would have delayed the product. In addition, there is a good > > chance that they will be more expensive due to the additional cost of the > > cambium synchronization hardware. > > > > > > On Nov 18, 2016 7:21 PM, "Matt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > The 1U injector is very close. I need to finish validation on the > >> > latest > >> > board revisions and then will be releasing it to production assuming > >> > there > >> > isn't some showstopper I missed. > >> > >> So how many port will this unit be? Will it support the new Cambium > >> Sync format for the 450m? > >> > >> Holding off on a few site upgrades since this unit will save me so MUCH > >> space. > > > > > > -- > > *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > > Tel: 406-449-3345 <(406)%20449-3345> | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, > Helena, MT 59602 > > [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com > > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > >
