At the very least I have to have 8 inductors, or 4 toroids choking the data 
going to the house.  Then we could have 8 switches that short out and bypass 
the chokes.  I think about this between 2 and 4 in the morning when the dreams 
do not entertain.  

(The last entertaining dream I had was an employee purchased two bottles of 
Listerine for me and we discovered that each bottle came with a stock 
certificate for the Listerine company under the label.  Then a guy from the 
Listerine company showed up and tried to strong arm me into signing a proxy.  I 
wouldn’t do it.      Where does this stuff come from...?)

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 2:03 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

Leave power on all 8 wires to the house and switch data on all 8 wires to the 
test port....the complexity of this problem just hit me.  Sounds like more 
trouble than anybody would want to pay you for.  


------ Original Message ------
From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 1/9/2017 3:55:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

  Sounds like you shouldn't.


  ------ Original Message ------
  From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: 1/9/2017 3:49:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

    I have thought about it.  

    First problem is the 8 pole dual throw switch.  They exist but they are 
physically large and expensive.

    Second problem is that 444 segregates data on 4 wires and power on 4 
different wires.  With GigE ata and power are on all 8 wires.  

    So, I would have to have some inductors switch into the circuit to block 
the data from the house when the test port is being used.  

    Can be done.  Not sure if I could do it in that small box.  And it would 
make it considerably more expensive.  
    Shall I do it?



    From: Adam Moffett 
    Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 1:44 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

    Way nicer!

    I imagine the 444 would work with a lot of Mikrotik CPE, or cameras, or 
anything 100BaseT with power on the spare pairs.  That probably means a hundred 
different possible uses to list. 
    *shrug* maybe it doesn't matter and they should just get the gigE unit if 
they're not sure.

    How come there's no test port on the GigE-POE?  Seems like if you could 
tick that one box you could just deprecate the 444.


    ------ Original Message ------
    From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: 1/9/2017 2:17:56 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

      This better?

      From: Adam Moffett 
      Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:55 AM
      To: [email protected] 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

      I think it's clear enough.  The only question that came to mind was I 
don't know what the Case Style of "PCB Only" means.  

      One other comment is that nothing actually says we're looking at surge 
protectors or that they are ethernet surge protectors.  That's irrelevant if 
the chart is displayed in a context where that's obvious. 


      ------ Original Message ------
      From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: 1/9/2017 1:02:27 PM
      Subject: [AFMUG] Emailing: Surge Suppressor Technical Chart.pdf

        How can I improve this?

Reply via email to