Even if EBITDA is zero year over year, you can look at growth of equity.  If 
the assets are truly worth what they are booked at, then buy for that value.  I 
prefer net present value of future cash flows to be a part of the analysis. 

But for something that has been a going concern for some time, with little debt 
and equity close to net asset value, multiples of EBITDA are a comfortable way 
to value the thing.  

However, in a WISP situation where you are buying the customer and some amount 
of SM and AP that may or may not have much value to you, net present value may 
be the way to go.  

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:39 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Price per sub?

I think there is some validity in getting the revenue and expense numbers 
separately and doing your own analysis.  If you just ask for their net income, 
that will vary greatly based on how the current owners are managing the 
business, I think there are 3 types:

 

1)  Being run as a startup

2)  Being run as a big company / cash cow

3)  Being groomed for sale

 

A 190 sub WISP is probably being run as a startup.  First, that means managing 
cashflow not profit.  Second, that means any time you  have an extra dime, you 
spend it on expanding the business.  If those are capital expenditures, maybe 
they go into depreciation and get excluded from EBITDA.  But if they go into 
advertising, subscriber radios, install materials and labor, etc., that gets 
expensed and makes the business look less profitable.

 

Whatever year it was that capital gains taxes went back up, I heard a tutorial 
on how to groom your business for sale before the deadline.  Basically you stop 
focusing on increasing revenue, and instead cut costs, it will immediately 
improve your EBITDA and therefore your valuation.  I think we’ve all 
experienced this when something causes us to temporarily cut back expenses, for 
me it happens every winter.  All of a sudden your business becomes a cash cow 
and looks amazingly profitable.  I also see this when I look at certain 
competitors who don’t have up to date equipment, don’t maintain their network, 
don’t have battery backup at tower sites, and all their customers hate them for 
their slow service, frequent outages, and poor customer service.  You ask 
yourself, how can they stay in business?  Ask yourself, if you cut way back on 
expenses, and as a result lost 25% of your customers every year, would your 
business be more or less profitable?  It might be more profitable.  Long term, 
you have to believe these WISPs will eventually go out of business, but year 
after year they survive.  And maybe someone will buy them because they are 
profitable on paper.  But they end up acquiring bad infrastructure and 
dissatisfied customers.

 

Not saying to ignore EBITDA, but I think many worthwhile WISPs that are still 
in startup mode will have zero EBITDA.  While if they have spent 6-12 months 
fluffing up the numbers to maximize their valuation for a sale, those better 
numbers may be deceptive.

 

One final note, when I worked at Tellabs (around 1990), I remember the founder 
saying you want to make a small profit.  Any more just means you pay more 
taxes, and some raider can buy you with your own cash.  Better to reinvest that 
money in the business.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Price per sub?

 

 

i hear that and 4x ebidta over and over.  in terms of they don't know what 
ebitda does i don't even ask for those numbers.  after initial conversations i 
always ask for a years worth of bank statements.  i've been known to go back 
three years.  i can plug that data into quickbooks in a day and then pull 
pretty much whatever financial data i need to pull.   and it does not offend 
the company you are trying to purchase who is almost guaranteed to now know 
that ebitda is (earnimngs before interest tax and depreciation)

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Mike Hammett 

To: [email protected] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:07 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Price per sub?

 

I hear that is around 12x - 18x months of revenue and a heck of a lot easier to 
calculate when ballparking. They know their revenue (or well, is somewhat easy 
to figure out). They probably can't spell EBITDA.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:16:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Price per sub?

4x ebitda

 

From: Josh Reynolds 

Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:14 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Price per sub?

 

How many subs?

 

On Jan 11, 2017 3:13 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

  When looking at buying a competitor, I'm wondering what everyone's thought is 
on a price per sub? They don't do contracts and they use the litebeam hardware.

  I'm not looking for legal advice, just wondering what all of you think is 
fair. This company has about a 90% take rate in the area they're in. Their 
plans are $20, $40, and $50/mo.

  Thank you,
  Brett A Mansfield

   

Reply via email to