Forest,

We are really excited about this product as well. I have actually held off on 
quite a few orders making due with older equipment while we waited for this new 
product. Let us know when we can get on the list…

 

Brandon

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List 
Account)
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 3:22 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

Very very close...

 

I'll be taking pre-orders as soon as I have a confirmed ship date on the 
enclosures, and am confident that I don't have a major design issue on the 
latest set of circuit boards (looking good so far).   I'm expecting this to 
happen in the next week or so, but I can't be 100% confident yet.

 

The ship dates after that will depend on the arrival of the enclosures and the 
final circuit boards.   

 

 

 

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Craig Schmaderer <cr...@skywaveconnect.com> 
wrote:

Forest how close are you to having that rack module ready!  I want now!

 

  _____  

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m 

 

I seem to remember there was a connection between Motorola and PCTel/Maxrad via 
executive Marty Singer.  I was shocked when I saw that, since I had experience 
with Mr. Singer when I was at Tellabs.  I will not comment further since this 
list is public and I don’t want to get sued.  I will note that if I remember 
correctly, his PhD was actually in Experimental Psychology, and this was 
evident in his dealings with coworkers.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had 
with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be 
listed on their third party website..... (I held H pol for over a year at their 
request due to their deal with Earthlink)

 

I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is not 
worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . . email.

 

[he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for the 
most part erroneous as listed below:

 

1.      WB is taking advantage of Motorola. 
2.      WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!) 
3.      WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars. 
4.      Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty. 
5.      Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz stinger. 
6.      (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just draw 
a waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he meant 
antenna pattern).

 

[he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd party 
listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)

 

I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and 
consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with the 
launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He indicated that I 
could not do that, I told him to just watch me.

 

He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued dialog.  I 
repeated multiple times, “please remove me from the website”.  I finally had to 
hang up on him .




-- 


Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602

 <mailto:forre...@imach.com> forre...@imach.com |  <http://www.packetflux.com/> 
http://www.packetflux.com

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>   <http://facebook.com/packetflux>   
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux> 

  <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose>   
<http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce>
   
<http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce>
 

Reply via email to