No doubt. So that makes him equivalent to JFK and Clinton, right?
*From:* Josh Reynolds
*Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2017 5:32 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Trump cheated on his first wife for what became his second.
On Jan 22, 2017 4:57 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
Clintons had JFK knocked off too...
On a more serious note, Bill was very effective in suppressing and
containing his bimbo eruption of rapes etc.
Does anyone doubt he did those things too?
Who has raped more women?
Bill Cosby
Bill Clinton
Donald Trump
If we throw some kind of standard of morality at a president then
it better be applied equally to all of them. I seriously doubt
Jimmy Carter cheated on his wife. How about JFK?
I have a standard I apply to business associates: you cheat on
our spouse you will cheat me too.
*From:* Josh Reynolds
*Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2017 3:50 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Have you ever looked at the list of people killed who were
involved in some way with the JFK assassination?
On Jan 22, 2017 4:34 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
One thing is for certain, absolute inarguable fact, these 63
people are as dead as you can get and all of them either
spilled the beans on the Clintons or had information that
could harm the Clintons.
So, if you want to talk ethics and morals of Trump, I have not
yet heard of anyone he had whacked. Maybe he is just better
at doing it.
1. Susan Coleman:
2. Larry Guerrin:
3. Kevin Ives
4. Don Henry:
5. Keith Coney:
6. Keith McKaskle:
7. Gregory Collins:
8. Jeff Rhodes:
9. James Milam:
10. Richard Winters:
11. Jordan Kettleson:
12. Alan Standorf:
13. Dennis Eisman: .
14. Danny Casalaro:
15. Victor Raiser:
16. R. Montgomery Raiser:
17. Paul Tully:
18. Ian Spiro:
19. Paula Gober:
20. Jim Wilhite:
21. Steve Willis,
22. Robert Williams,
23. Todd McKeahan
24. Conway LeBleu:
25. Sgt. Brian Haney,
26. Sgt. Tim Sabel,
27. Maj. William Barkley,
28. Capt. Scott Reynolds:
29. John Crawford:
30. John Wilson:
31. Paul Wilcher:
32. Vincent Foster:
33. Jon Parnell Walker:
34. Stanley Heard
35. Steven Dickson:
36. Jerry Luther Parks:
37. Ed Willey:
38. Gandy Baugh:
39. Herschell Friday:
40. Ronald Rogers:
41. Kathy Furguson:
42. Bill Shelton:
43. Stanley Huggins:
44. Paul Olson:
45. Calvin Walraven:
46. Alan G. Whicher:
47. Duane Garrett:
48. Ron Brown:.
49. Charles Meissner:
50. William Colby:
51. Admiral Jeremy Boorda:
52. Lance Herndon:
53. Neil Moody:
54. Barbara Wise:
55. Doug Adams:
56. Mary C. Mahoney:
57. Ronald Miller:
58. Sandy Hume:
59. Jim McDougal:
60. Johnny Lawhon:
61. Charles Wilbourne Miller:
62. Carlos Ghigliotti:
63. Tony Moser:
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 2:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his
money. Some were legal, some were not. You may consider that
smart, and that's your right. I do not.
On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler"
<[email protected]> wrote:
He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good
decisions. Historically that's not been common in politics.
It's always been mostly 'spenders'
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected]> wrote:
Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact,
it often happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence.
On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us.
But if your looking for miracles you might be better off
reading the bible.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza
<[email protected]> wrote:
Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope
now.... Waiting for right time to do it comrades
On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds"
<[email protected]> wrote:
https://streamable.com/md28v
I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump
presidency is not some kind of joke taken too far...
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza
<[email protected]> wrote:
Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this..
https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751
<https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751>
On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house
website. The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and
half attended inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more...
His ego is bruised. Let me Trumpspeak... So sad.
On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<[email protected]> wrote:
there is this gem now
http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/
24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt
<[email protected]> wrote:
Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very
difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is
known to be very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems
the „normal“ media in USA is biased, too.
E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election
where it was clear he started a war based on wrong
information. This is unthinkable here. It would be the one
point which would dominate the discussion and would make him
unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion away
from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable.
Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a
topic which is minor at best but was discussed the whole time.
I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get
reelected if media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one
person is much less a problem than starting a war where
thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 reasons why
this person has to die and would find other topics to report.
Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy.
For sure you have a problem.
Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von That One
Guy /sarcasm
Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to
effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the
current environment. Between press releases, Publicly
accessible data, FOIA responses, live streamed events, and one
on one interviews (and yes...twitter) the press really is the
dialup internet method of getting information. We know more in
real time then the press could ever package up and present.
The current mindset of media in press conferences is that of
militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero
professionalism from either one. Neither really gives a damn
what the answer is anyway, theyre going to report whatever
their preconceived response was either way.
Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target?
Answer: Yes
CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike
removing 100 ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency.
This act ensures that those who would commit terror will be
addressed accordingly, even during the transition of power.
Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military
conflict day before leaving office, leaving all Americans at
risk during a tumultuous time of transition. Kills 100,
ensuring a retaliatory response.
Had the same attack been authorized today:
CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets.
Top military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity,
refuse to verify there were no civilian casualties, at least
100 confirmed dead. War crime charges possible?
Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the
removal of 100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander
in Chief. Rumors of ISIS surrender. Barack Obama potentially
one of the dead operatives.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just
impressed by the first white house press briefing and the
remarks at Langley. What an amazing public speaker this one
is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's uncle or something
who did too much meth? You know how they start out with one
sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen
other stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever
do??? We have four years of that to look forward to. Just
watch the full speech at the CIA, you will see what I mean.
Or don't....save yourself the pain.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected]> wrote:
Can we talk about politics yet? :P
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part
of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part
of the team.
