Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... Waiting for right time to do it comrades
On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: > https://streamable.com/md28v > > I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not > some kind of joke taken too far... > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. >> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpo >> st.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. >>> The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >>> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let >>> me Trumpspeak... So sad. >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> there is this gem now >>>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very >>>>> difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be >>>>> very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in >>>>> USA is biased, too. >>>>> >>>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where >>>>> it was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is >>>>> unthinkable here. It would be the one point which would dominate the >>>>> discussion and would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move >>>>> the >>>>> discussion away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him >>>>> votable. >>>>> >>>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which >>>>> is minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >>>>> >>>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >>>>> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a >>>>> problem >>>>> than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >>>>> reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure >>>>> you have a problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to >>>>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current >>>>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA >>>>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and >>>>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of getting >>>>> information. We know more in real time then the press could ever package >>>>> up >>>>> and present. The current mindset of media in press conferences is that of >>>>> militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero professionalism >>>>> from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, >>>>> theyre going to report whatever their preconceived response was either >>>>> way. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Answer: Yes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 >>>>> ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those >>>>> who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >>>>> transition of power. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >>>>> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous >>>>> time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >>>>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >>>>> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime >>>>> charges possible? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of >>>>> 100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of >>>>> ISIS >>>>> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by >>>>> the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >>>>> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or >>>>> friend's >>>>> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out >>>>> with >>>>> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >>>>> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >>>>> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >>>>> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >
