He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. Some were
legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your right. I
do not.

On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote:

> He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions.
> Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly
> 'spenders'
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often
> happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence.
>
> On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if your
>> looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible.
>>
>> Jon Langeler
>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Empty promises just like his brain.    But it's okay to grope now....
>> Waiting for right time to do it comrades
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> https://streamable.com/md28v
>>>
>>> I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not
>>> some kind of joke taken too far...
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this..
>>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpo
>>>> st.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website.
>>>>> The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended
>>>>> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised.  Let
>>>>> me Trumpspeak... So sad.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> there is this gem now
>>>>>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/
>>>>>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very
>>>>>>> difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be
>>>>>>> very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in
>>>>>>> USA is biased, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where
>>>>>>> it was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is
>>>>>>> unthinkable here. It would be the one point which would dominate the
>>>>>>> discussion and would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> discussion away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him
>>>>>>> votable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic
>>>>>>> which is minor at best but was discussed the whole time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected
>>>>>>> if media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a
>>>>>>> problem than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would
>>>>>>> find 100 reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> report.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure
>>>>>>> you have a problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One
>>>>>>> Guy /sarcasm
>>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05
>>>>>>> *An:* [email protected]
>>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to
>>>>>>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current
>>>>>>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA
>>>>>>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and
>>>>>>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of getting
>>>>>>> information. We know more in real time then the press could ever 
>>>>>>> package up
>>>>>>> and present. The current mindset of media in press conferences is that 
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero 
>>>>>>> professionalism
>>>>>>> from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the answer is anyway,
>>>>>>> theyre going to report whatever their preconceived response was either 
>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Answer: Yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100
>>>>>>> ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that 
>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>> who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the
>>>>>>> transition of power.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict
>>>>>>> day before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a
>>>>>>> tumultuous time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory 
>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Had the same attack been authorized today:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top
>>>>>>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify
>>>>>>> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War 
>>>>>>> crime
>>>>>>> charges possible?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump  authorized the removal of
>>>>>>> 100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of 
>>>>>>> ISIS
>>>>>>> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm all for it.  I think that everyone is probably just impressed by
>>>>>>> the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley.  What 
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> amazing public speaker this one is.  Have you ever had a friend or 
>>>>>>> friend's
>>>>>>> uncle or something who did too much meth?  You know how they start out 
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other
>>>>>>> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do???  We have
>>>>>>> four years of that to look forward to.  Just watch the full speech at 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> CIA, you will see what I mean.  Or don't....save yourself the pain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to