He also ran a lot of less than ethical schemes to make his money. Some were legal, some were not. You may consider that smart, and that's your right. I do not.
On Jan 22, 2017 2:53 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > He had money, knew to hire the right people, and made good decisions. > Historically that's not been common in politics. It's always been mostly > 'spenders' > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jan 22, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > > Net worth is in no way an indicator of intelligence. In fact, it often > happens by accident, or in spite of intelligence. > > On Jan 22, 2017 2:00 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Considering his net worth he might he smarter than any of us. But if your >> looking for miracles you might be better off reading the bible. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Empty promises just like his brain. But it's okay to grope now.... >> Waiting for right time to do it comrades >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 10:38 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> https://streamable.com/md28v >>> >>> I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not >>> some kind of joke taken too far... >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. >>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpo >>>> st.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 >>>> >>>> On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. >>>>> The bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >>>>> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let >>>>> me Trumpspeak... So sad. >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> there is this gem now >>>>>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>>>>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very >>>>>>> difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be >>>>>>> very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in >>>>>>> USA is biased, too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where >>>>>>> it was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is >>>>>>> unthinkable here. It would be the one point which would dominate the >>>>>>> discussion and would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> discussion away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him >>>>>>> votable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic >>>>>>> which is minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected >>>>>>> if media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a >>>>>>> problem than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would >>>>>>> find 100 reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> report. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure >>>>>>> you have a problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One >>>>>>> Guy /sarcasm >>>>>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>>>>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to >>>>>>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current >>>>>>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA >>>>>>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and >>>>>>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of getting >>>>>>> information. We know more in real time then the press could ever >>>>>>> package up >>>>>>> and present. The current mindset of media in press conferences is that >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero >>>>>>> professionalism >>>>>>> from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, >>>>>>> theyre going to report whatever their preconceived response was either >>>>>>> way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Answer: Yes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 >>>>>>> ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that >>>>>>> those >>>>>>> who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >>>>>>> transition of power. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict >>>>>>> day before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a >>>>>>> tumultuous time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory >>>>>>> response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >>>>>>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >>>>>>> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War >>>>>>> crime >>>>>>> charges possible? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of >>>>>>> 100 ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of >>>>>>> ISIS >>>>>>> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by >>>>>>> the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What >>>>>>> an >>>>>>> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or >>>>>>> friend's >>>>>>> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >>>>>>> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >>>>>>> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>
