Assume the endpoints are the same and that header compression is equally effective on both packet sizes.
Now explain how smaller packets are more efficient. On Feb 15, 2017 12:05 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: You're forgetting about the header compression. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ------------------------------ *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> *To: *[email protected] *Sent: *Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:41:45 AM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed Huh? More packets = more overhead. Less packets = less overhead. On Feb 15, 2017 10:37 AM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you have those numbers flipped. It does more speed with small > packets. > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > > At 1024QAM it does 761Mbps LG packets and 486Mbps SM packets. When I ran > TCP speed tests on the link I got 750Mbps though. > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, it is 1024. >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is that 2048, Jeremy? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Our 6GHz Trango link does 750Mbps FDX on a 60MHz channel width. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No but it’s the middle of Phoenix, I’d be surprised if it was. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeff >>>>> Broadwick - Lists >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2017 5:06 AM >>>>> >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did you check and see if there is a 60MHz channel available in 6GHz >>>>> Rory? >>>>> >>>>> Jeff Broadwick >>>>> >>>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> 312-205-2519 <%28312%29%20205-2519> Office >>>>> >>>>> 574-220-7826 <%28574%29%20220-7826> Cell >>>>> >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Will the Cambium 820 support that? >>>>> >>>>> Rory >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On >>>>> Behalf Of George Skorup >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:25 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed >>>>> >>>>> IIRC, there are 10 channel pairs on the 40MHz channel plan for 18GHz. >>>>> You could always do 2+0 if there are two channels available on your >>>>> proposed path. >>>>> >>>>> On 2/15/2017 12:06 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 12 miles. Needs 4' dishes minimum but I didn't ask about both >>>>> polarities. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> >>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On >>>>> Behalf Of Trey Scarborough >>>>> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:05 PM >>>>> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hmm Xpic if you can get 40mhz on H and V. are you trying to make this >>>>> >>>>> go >>>>> >>>>> 30 miles though... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/14/2017 10:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have a link where only 40MHz is available. What would my best >>>>> >>>>> option be to get more than 500Mbps out of it? 2048QAM is limited to >>>>> 347Mbps. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Rory Conaway **� Triad Wireless �**CEO* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *4226 S. 37^th Street � Phoenix � AZ 85040* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *602-426-0542 <%28602%29%20426-0542>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>>>> <[email protected]>>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * * >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> �The successful man is the one who finds out what is the matter >>>>> >>>>> with his business before his competitors do.� - Roy L. Smith >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
