I would think so... but it doesn't matter so much when you don't have control over the type of packets being sent. If you can compress a couple hundred meg worth of headers at one end of the link, and decompress them at the other end, you'll see that much more traffic on the ethernet interface... the actual data being sent isn't going to be more, but it will effectively give you more capacity.
But I don't claim to actually know what I'm talking about... On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Even with header compression, via packet aggregation you shouldnt you > still be able to send more data with larger packet sizes? > > On Feb 15, 2017 10:43 AM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> More packets = more headers that can be compressed >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Huh? More packets = more overhead. Less packets = less overhead. >>> >>> On Feb 15, 2017 10:37 AM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I think you have those numbers flipped. It does more speed with small >>>> packets. >>>> >>>> Jon Langeler >>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> At 1024QAM it does 761Mbps LG packets and 486Mbps SM packets. When I >>>> ran TCP speed tests on the link I got 750Mbps though. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No, it is 1024. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is that 2048, Jeremy? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Our 6GHz Trango link does 750Mbps FDX on a 60MHz channel width. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Rory Conaway < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No but it’s the middle of Phoenix, I’d be surprised if it was. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rory >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeff >>>>>>>> Broadwick - Lists >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2017 5:06 AM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did you check and see if there is a 60MHz channel available in 6GHz >>>>>>>> Rory? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jeff Broadwick >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will the Cambium 820 support that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rory >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On >>>>>>>> Behalf Of George Skorup >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:25 PM >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IIRC, there are 10 channel pairs on the 40MHz channel plan for >>>>>>>> 18GHz. >>>>>>>> You could always do 2+0 if there are two channels available on your >>>>>>>> proposed path. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/15/2017 12:06 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 12 miles. Needs 4' dishes minimum but I didn't ask about both >>>>>>>> polarities. Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rory >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On >>>>>>>> Behalf Of Trey Scarborough >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:05 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmm Xpic if you can get 40mhz on H and V. are you trying to make >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 30 miles though... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/14/2017 10:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a link where only 40MHz is available. What would my best >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> option be to get more than 500Mbps out of it? 2048QAM is limited >>>>>>>> to 347Mbps. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Rory Conaway **� Triad Wireless �**CEO* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *4226 S. 37^th Street � Phoenix � AZ 85040* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> �The successful man is the one who finds out what is the matter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> with his business before his competitors do.� - Roy L. Smith >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
