Huh? I've seen full product listings from both vendors. They were posted to NANOG almost a week ago.
On Feb 18, 2017 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > Or maybe more than 18 months. And only if you have certain models, which > we won’t tell you. And it’s due to a certain component from a certain > vendor, which we won’t tell you. And you can maybe get an advance > replacement before it bricks, but only if you have a maintenance contract. > And there’s probably no diagnostic to tell you ahead of time that it’s > about to brick. > > > > The only good news seems to be that apparently it’s 2016 production that’s > affected, and given the tendency of WISPs to only buy Juniper or Cisco > stuff on the used market once the price has come down out of the > stratosphere, we probably aren’t affected. More of a first world problem. > > > > Maybe the CIA will leak the information to the dishonest media and we’ll > find out via CNN. Or should I be checking Breitbart and Infowars? Maybe > the National Enquirer. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:28 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco > routers, switches | Network World > > > > TLDR: After ~18 months, the devices brick. > > > > On Feb 18, 2017 10:55 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seldom have so many words been used to convey so little information. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Saturday, February 18, 2017 7:06 AM > *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco > routers, switches | Network World > > > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/3170065/router/ > juniper-facing-fatal-clock-flaw-that-impacts-cisco- > routers-switches.html?google_editors_picks=true > >
