I do have some Supermicro servers that use Intel C2750 processors, and would 
have fallen into the 2013 – 2016 timeframe.  They’ve been in service for awhile 
though.  I guess there’s no way to know if they will turn into pumpkins.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco 
routers, switches | Network World

 

That’s good.  The linked article was very vague however.

 

What is the component at the heart of this, and who makes it?

 

If it affects lowly Intel Atom boxes, it can’t be much more than a crystal 
oscillator?

 

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:22 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco 
routers, switches | Network World

 

Huh? I've seen full product listings from both vendors. They were posted to 
NANOG almost a week ago.

 

On Feb 18, 2017 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> wrote:

Or maybe more than 18 months.  And only if you have certain models, which we 
won’t tell you.  And it’s due to a certain component from a certain vendor, 
which we won’t tell you.  And you can maybe get an advance replacement before 
it bricks, but only if you have a maintenance contract.  And there’s probably 
no diagnostic to tell you ahead of time that it’s about to brick.

 

The only good news seems to be that apparently it’s 2016 production that’s 
affected, and given the tendency of WISPs to only buy Juniper or Cisco stuff on 
the used market once the price has come down out of the stratosphere, we 
probably aren’t affected.  More of a first world problem.

 

Maybe the CIA will leak the information to the dishonest media and we’ll find 
out via CNN.  Or should I be checking Breitbart and Infowars?  Maybe the 
National Enquirer.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf 
Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:28 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco 
routers, switches | Network World

 

TLDR: After ~18 months, the devices brick.

 

On Feb 18, 2017 10:55 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Seldom have so many words been used to convey so little information.

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf 
Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 7:06 AM
To: Animal Farm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco routers, 
switches | Network World

 

http://www.networkworld.com/article/3170065/router/juniper-facing-fatal-clock-flaw-that-impacts-cisco-routers-switches.html?google_editors_picks=true

Reply via email to