We have been going through everything we have and so far only found one set of hardware affected … Lanner boxes we use for a specific service to some customers as a managed CPE …. last I heard we’re probably dumping Lanner anyways due to high rate of hardware failures so this is easy to digest :)
None of our Cisco or Juniper (or anything else “core” related) has the C2000 series in it thankfully …. we’re still looking though … > On Feb 18, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/5rmsw0/-/dd8kbvz > <http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/5rmsw0/-/dd8kbvz> > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/web/clock-signal.html#~faqs > <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/web/clock-signal.html#~faqs>, > > "Cisco is not alone – Dell is also affected, users of Synology storage > devices have been talking about it. HP, NEC, NetGear, SuperMicro, and the > list goes on and on. > HP MoonShot M300/M350, Dell FX, Segate home NAS products, PFSense NetGate" > > https://cantechit.com/2017/02/07/clockgate-2017-the-intel-atom-c2000/ > <https://cantechit.com/2017/02/07/clockgate-2017-the-intel-atom-c2000/> > "In January 2017 in the Intel Atom C2000 Series spec revision Intel published > information about a flaw “System May Experience Inability to Boot or May > Cease Operation”and potential high rate of failures after 18 months of use > because of a faulty clock component. > > The official errata says the B0 stepping of C2xxx Atoms are vulnerable to > failure, and these parts began shipping in 2013. The specific SKUs are: > C2308, C2338, C2350, C2358, C2508, C2518, C2530, C2538, C2550, C2558, C2718, > C2730, C2738, C2750, and C2758." > https://gixtools.net/2017/02/hardware-affected-clock-flaw-intel-avotonrangeley-complete-list/ > > <https://gixtools.net/2017/02/hardware-affected-clock-flaw-intel-avotonrangeley-complete-list/> > > Juniper Networks list attached > > > > > On Feb 18, 2017 2:33 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > That’s good. The linked article was very vague however. > > > > What is the component at the heart of this, and who makes it? > > > > If it affects lowly Intel Atom boxes, it can’t be much more than a crystal > oscillator? > > > > <> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Josh Reynolds > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:22 PM > > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco > routers, switches | Network World > > > > Huh? I've seen full product listings from both vendors. They were posted to > NANOG almost a week ago. > > > > On Feb 18, 2017 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Or maybe more than 18 months. And only if you have certain models, which we > won’t tell you. And it’s due to a certain component from a certain vendor, > which we won’t tell you. And you can maybe get an advance replacement before > it bricks, but only if you have a maintenance contract. And there’s probably > no diagnostic to tell you ahead of time that it’s about to brick. > > > > The only good news seems to be that apparently it’s 2016 production that’s > affected, and given the tendency of WISPs to only buy Juniper or Cisco stuff > on the used market once the price has come down out of the stratosphere, we > probably aren’t affected. More of a first world problem. > > > > Maybe the CIA will leak the information to the dishonest media and we’ll find > out via CNN. Or should I be checking Breitbart and Infowars? Maybe the > National Enquirer. > > > > <> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Josh Reynolds > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:28 PM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco > routers, switches | Network World > > > > TLDR: After ~18 months, the devices brick. > > > > On Feb 18, 2017 10:55 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Seldom have so many words been used to convey so little information. > > <> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Jaime Solorza > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 7:06 AM > To: Animal Farm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [AFMUG] Juniper facing fatal clock flaw that impacts Cisco routers, > switches | Network World > > > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/3170065/router/juniper-facing-fatal-clock-flaw-that-impacts-cisco-routers-switches.html?google_editors_picks=true > > <http://www.networkworld.com/article/3170065/router/juniper-facing-fatal-clock-flaw-that-impacts-cisco-routers-switches.html?google_editors_picks=true> > <pazAaAl.jpg>
