And one person's rebel is another person's patriot.
On Feb 26, 2017 10:30 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote:
> One person's leaker is another's whistle blower.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 2/26/2017 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>
> Quite a slippery slope there. I think if they are leaking an attempt at
> covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute
> the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who
> leaked the attempt at covering it up. I don't think any of them deserves a
> bullet. As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to
> grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that
> supposedly champions a 'right to life'. Let me guess, you probably support
> running over protesters in the streets too, right?
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release
>> devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate
>> they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of
>> leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all.
>> The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do
>> you spit on veterans too?
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve. Those people who released the
>> trivial BS deserve to die?? There is the far right, and then there is bat
>> shit crazy. Where do you think you fall?
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them
>>> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style
>>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and
>>>> friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally
>>>> the truth about Roswell will be leaked ...
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive
>>>>> information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure
>>>>> place.
>>>>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the
>>>>> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing
>>>>> mechanisms
>>>>> to go right to the media should earn a bullet
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the
>>>>>> leaks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn
>>>>>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff
>>>>>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
