I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek.
But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do and they fail, then the press is fine, but it used to be the press would investigate it, verify it where possible, now its a direct to the plate scenario. Snowden needs to never come back, because he should be shot, he never attempted a formal channel, and he had the tech prowess to dead man switch an insurance data dump. The leaker who got our seal killed needs blacksited and never seen again. These leakers of everything just need a bullet in the head and their bodies left for the raccoons. Yeah, I do bluff a lot in poker, mainly because I drink a lot and forget how to play mid game. On Feb 26, 2017 10:22 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote: Quite a slippery slope there. I think if they are leaking an attempt at covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who leaked the attempt at covering it up. I don't think any of them deserves a bullet. As a strong second amendment-supporting liberal, I find it hard to grasp the quick rush to murder people from the political party that supposedly champions a 'right to life'. Let me guess, you probably support running over protesters in the streets too, right? On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release > devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate > they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of > leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all. > The fact you think leaks are ok makes you much more a piece of work. Do > you spit on veterans too? > > On Feb 26, 2017 9:11 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve. Those people who released the > trivial BS deserve to die?? There is the far right, and then there is bat > shit crazy. Where do you think you fall? > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them >> he killed during a "robbery" democrat style >> >> On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I >>> agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth >>> about Roswell will be leaked ... >>> >>> On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information >>>> leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place. >>>> Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the >>>> press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms >>>> to go right to the media should earn a bullet >>>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2017 6:58 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the >>>>> leaks. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxn >>>>>> ews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staff >>>>>> ers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843 >>>>>> >>>>> > >
