Phew, lots of deleting.  Have we passed this turd finally?

Deep cleansing breath, in through the nose, slow out through pursed lips.  
Repeat, repeat, ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I have wonder why Marines always want to be called Warriors when all the other 
soldiers and sailors are OK with their titles?  My son in law is a Marine.  He 
put on a uniform and shot bullets at enemies, same as the army guys.  

From: Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:21 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's 
death in Yemen raid

There is a very large group of veterans who are fucking pissed that our 
commander in chief said that we don't fight to win. Mattis is also pissed his 
new boss called him a soldier. I love my retarted marine brothers and sisters, 
and we take offense whenever some civvy doesn't know the difference. 

That aside, with this raid being as botched as it was there were some critical 
failures in both intelligence and decision making at the highest level. Those 
units don't act unless they have very very very recent (sometimes to the 
minute) info unless told otherwise. Several things went wrong, no doubt, and 
some of that squarely falls on Trump. I don't care if he's your guy or if he's 
not, I don't give a damn. The go call in this instance was the wrong one.

On Feb 28, 2017 7:10 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

  I never said all, I said all I know, limited to probably around fifty, only 
one is lt colonel in airforce reserves so no high ranking, and only two special 
forces limited to Rangers, the rest all being regular personnel, so not a great 
representation of the WHOLE military, but given the mindset amongst them I'd 
venture a guess without much apprehension that they are a pretty good 
representation of the military overall.

  On Feb 28, 2017 7:02 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> wrote:

    You think all military active and veterans like Trump?  Wow....Trump was 
right about one thing.. he could kill someone in Times Square, and you'd say it 
okay....I don't get it ...My critical mind is trying to understand this blind 
faith in him... Almost like Jim Jones...Damn....

    On Feb 28, 2017 5:49 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

      Can't go with that when it came to our capabilities and mission 
objectives the last guy was mouth in chief. This admin didn't want any military 
plans made public ever. 
      I'd like to think at the end of the day this was just a mission that 
turned shitshow fast on its own. It is an insult to call it poor planning 
considering that's saying the mission training over the last 3 months wasn't 
taken seriously by the SEAL team. 
      I personally wouldn't be at all suprised if the community organizer in 
chief had his minions leak the details. Or one of his antifa terrorist friends 
still embedded in the administration did so. All to do what was done, discredit 
the current administration. Every currently serving and veteran military 
personnel I know, with hehe exception of Josh here, supports trump and 
understands what went down in this mission was what it was and wants the same 
as I do from the people responsible if there was a leak. 
      Even their lost  brother in arms brother is a seal and hasn't said 
anything negative (though that may be a limitation of his status)


      On Feb 28, 2017 6:35 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote:

        Might be simpler than that. Could just be a few idiots in the new admin 
that don't know how to keep their traps shut. His Orangeness doesn't seem to 
connect the dots very well himself. He thought the conversations that Flynn was 
having with the Russians were a good thing.



        On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:25 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> 
wrote:




        Who benefits from the leak?
          1.. ISIS 
          2.. Enemies of Trump/GOP/USA
        ISIS probably did not leak to themselves.  

        So what does that leave us with?

        Apply Occam's razor.  

        From: That One Guy /sarcasm 
        Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:47 PM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for 
SEAL's death in Yemen raid

        Exactly, thats why the dad didnt need to request an investigation, it 
is being investigated 

        He should have not addressed that during the softball interview and 
waited til tonights address with a prepared speech

        but this is going to have a shit ton of fallout

        On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

          The person to blame is the one that leaked details of the action to 
the bad guys.  
          They walked into a setup.  This was long planned under Obama.  

          How do you not know that Obama did not leak it to make Trump look 
bad?  Or Hillary?

          Somebody in the know leaked it.  

          He blamed our military.  He is the Commander.  Therefore he is 
blaming himself irrespective of his words.
          The guy certainly has no grace or class when it comes to things like 
this.  He needs a bit of “the buck stops here” but he is just the opposite.  

          From: Jaime Solorza 
          Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:29 PM
          To: Animal Farm 
          Subject: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for 
SEAL's death in Yemen raid

          https://news.google.com/news/ amp?caurl=http%3A%2F% 
2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy% 2Fdefense%2F321614-trump- appears-to-place-blame-on- 
generals-for-seal-killed-in- yemen-raid%3Famp#pt0-72526




        -- 

        If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your 
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.



Reply via email to