I figured someone had to be doing it. Its not that big of deal until we have a failure on one of the pucks in bad weather and then we will want to drop back to the packetflux. I can’t figure out why the 450i works fine and the epmp wont. Its seems like they should be the same. We started on 24 volts went to 29.5 volts and then to 48 volts just to match the 450i stuff. No difference.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2.4 epmp and packetflux 24v Power Injector has worked for ages here. CMM3 on four 2.4 and four 5 GHz. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <[email protected]> wrote: Is anyone successfully running epmp 2.4 aps on packetflux as the primary GPS for them? We have our sites with the onboard GPS puck as the primary GPS and just recently started powering the newest sites with Packetflux in order to provide a secondary GPS signal. At one site we has an AP that the puck GPS was blocked during install and would not receive sync so we turned on CMM3 and never were able to get GPS. Eventually we just did a climb and moved the puck and its receiving GPS now. Last week when installing a new site I decided to try GPS through the packetflux again and was not able to receive it. If I swap one of the cables from a 450i into the same port on the packetflux we get GPS no problem on the 450i AP but no joy on the epmp. I even went out and grabbed an extra AP off the truck plugged it in with a 2 foot none shielded Ethernet to the packetflux and still no GPS on CMM3. We are using power injector plus at the newest sites. No changes using them out of the box on 48 volts and like I mentioned they provide GPS just fine to the450i. So I am wondering if anyone is running this setup successfully of if we are all just using the puck. Thanks, Brandon
