lmao, hes on crack ask the Dakota Access folks about going under a body of water
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > All Navigable waters of the US. > > Big deal about repealing a former administrations work that made this rule > apply to seasonal streams too. > Which extended it to animal watering ponds in the midwest etc etc. > > -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber > > Does Army Corp of Engineers have jurisdiction on any body of water or > just that one? I was recently talking to someone about HD Boring under > a river. He ended going through an existing conduit on a bridge > instead, but he seemed to think going under the river wouldn't be a big > deal. > > .....that was obviously not 12 miles wide. More like 1200'. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: 4/27/2017 5:22:31 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber > > Army corp of engineers has jurisdiction. You will probably have to bury >> it 4 feet deep. They use jet plows for these underwater jobs. >> >> You need armored cable. Normal FO cable will float. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Brett A Mansfield >> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 3:07 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber >> >> I am working on getting a link over a lake that is 12 miles wide. The >> lake is only 8 feet deep (Utah Lake in Utah County Utah). I don't really >> have the means to run Fiber at the bottom of this lake, but it made me >> curious how someone would go about it? What kind of cable would be >> required, how would it be permitted, is this a common practice, etc? I just >> wanted to get people's thoughts on it. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> > >
