You mean my associate talking about going under a river? That's inside
of a city.....and not petroleum.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 4/27/2017 6:10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber
lmao, hes on crack
ask the Dakota Access folks about going under a body of water
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
All Navigable waters of the US.
Big deal about repealing a former administrations work that made this
rule apply to seasonal streams too.
Which extended it to animal watering ponds in the midwest etc etc.
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber
Does Army Corp of Engineers have jurisdiction on any body of water or
just that one? I was recently talking to someone about HD Boring
under
a river. He ended going through an existing conduit on a bridge
instead, but he seemed to think going under the river wouldn't be a
big
deal.
.....that was obviously not 12 miles wide. More like 1200'.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 4/27/2017 5:22:31 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber
Army corp of engineers has jurisdiction. You will probably have to
bury it 4 feet deep. They use jet plows for these underwater jobs.
You need armored cable. Normal FO cable will float.
-----Original Message----- From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 3:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] Underwater fiber
I am working on getting a link over a lake that is 12 miles wide. The
lake is only 8 feet deep (Utah Lake in Utah County Utah). I don't
really have the means to run Fiber at the bottom of this lake, but it
made me curious how someone would go about it? What kind of cable
would be required, how would it be permitted, is this a common
practice, etc? I just wanted to get people's thoughts on it.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
