*nods* I was hoping for a more sciencey and bean countery answer. ;-)
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 9:58:40 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Suppression Question Any exposed conductor will have a voltage induced on it by lightning strikes. Less conductors, less problems. I would think fiber and power would be more robust than ethernet. From: Mike Hammett Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Suppression Question This question is intended for Chuck and Forest, but I'll accept answers from anyone else qualified. I assume that the costs and complexities of doing surge suppression on a basic 48v DC power cable are much lower than doing so on a cat6 cable, trying to preserve GigE or above. Could you confirm that and perhaps back it up with costs, commentary, etc.? My point is to show that DC+ fiber not only is better for the data ports on both sides, but also for the tower equipment in general by being able to do more effective and less expensive surge suppression on raw DC than Ethernet. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP
