So I guess what I am asking is do you have an opinion if fiber plus dc only
might be "better" in some way than poe?

On Wed, May 10, 2017, 3:32 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> I guess my point is that you do not want MOVs for data.
> The sidactors are extremely fast and they are on all my stuff.
> Along with gas tubes, which are much faster than MOVs too.
>
>
>
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:42 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Suppression Question
> So Chuck, what is your opinion then? Looking at your site there is only
> about a $10 delta between the DC only and POE if I was looking at the right
> ones. Can you make an product to clamp faster without data on the lines or
> am I just imaging that? My thought was you could design it closer to 48
> volts but most equipment draws a lot more than that on startup anyway.
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> MOV is slow and bad for data but power
>> SAD is fast but not robust
>> Gas tube is robust
>>
>> I use all 3 on my power surge arrestor products.
>>
>> *From:* Lewis Bergman
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 9:12 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Suppression Question
>> When I made the decision to the extent possible, eliminate CAT5 powered
>> devices and go all fiber and 48VDC I based it on two things.
>> I found MOV/SAD combination devices for about $15 to protect the DC line
>> compared to about ~$65 at the time for CAT5. Not only that, I found those
>> devices speced faster clamp times. I assume since they did not have to
>> worry about the voltage differentials of the data pairs. Chuck could
>> obviously answer that one. This was a long time ago so I can't say what
>> current pricing would be. I also found after converting to that that we had
>> less, not zero, but less issues with the fiber plus DC with protection
>> setup than the same equipment fed CAT5 POE with surge.
>>
>> We used all DIN mounted stuff.
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:02 AM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *nods* I was hoping for a more sciencey and bean countery answer.  ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *[email protected]
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, May 10, 2017 9:58:40 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Suppression Question
>>>
>>>
>>> Any exposed conductor will have a voltage induced on it by lightning
>>> strikes.  Less conductors, less problems.  I would think fiber and power
>>> would be more robust than ethernet.
>>>
>>> *From:* Mike Hammett
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:56 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Suppression Question
>>>
>>> This question is intended for Chuck and Forest, but I'll accept answers
>>> from anyone else qualified.
>>>
>>> I assume that the costs and complexities of doing surge suppression on a
>>> basic 48v DC power cable are much lower than doing so on a cat6 cable,
>>> trying to preserve GigE or above. Could you confirm that and perhaps back
>>> it up with costs, commentary, etc.?
>>>
>>> My point is to show that DC+ fiber not only is better for the data ports
>>> on both sides, but also for the tower equipment in general by being able to
>>> do more effective and less expensive surge suppression on raw DC than
>>> Ethernet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to