MOV is slow and bad for data but power
SAD is fast but not robust
Gas tube is robust

I use all 3 on my power surge arrestor products.  

From: Lewis Bergman 
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 9:12 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Suppression Question

When I made the decision to the extent possible, eliminate CAT5 powered devices 
and go all fiber and 48VDC I based it on two things. 
I found MOV/SAD combination devices for about $15 to protect the DC line 
compared to about ~$65 at the time for CAT5. Not only that, I found those 
devices speced faster clamp times. I assume since they did not have to worry 
about the voltage differentials of the data pairs. Chuck could obviously answer 
that one. This was a long time ago so I can't say what current pricing would 
be. I also found after converting to that that we had less, not zero, but less 
issues with the fiber plus DC with protection setup than the same equipment fed 
CAT5 POE with surge.

We used all DIN mounted stuff.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:02 AM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

  *nods* I was hoping for a more sciencey and bean countery answer.  ;-)





  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions

  Midwest Internet Exchange

  The Brothers WISP






------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: [email protected]
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 9:58:40 AM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Suppression Question



  Any exposed conductor will have a voltage induced on it by lightning strikes. 
 Less conductors, less problems.  I would think fiber and power would be more 
robust than ethernet.  

  From: Mike Hammett 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 8:56 AM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: [AFMUG] Suppression Question

  This question is intended for Chuck and Forest, but I'll accept answers from 
anyone else qualified.

  I assume that the costs and complexities of doing surge suppression on a 
basic 48v DC power cable are much lower than doing so on a cat6 cable, trying 
to preserve GigE or above. Could you confirm that and perhaps back it up with 
costs, commentary, etc.?

  My point is to show that DC+ fiber not only is better for the data ports on 
both sides, but also for the tower equipment in general by being able to do 
more effective and less expensive surge suppression on raw DC than Ethernet.




  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions

  Midwest Internet Exchange

  The Brothers WISP




Reply via email to