Ahhh the great memories... That was my first computer ! 

Faisal Imtiaz 

> From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:15:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF

> Timex Sinclair ZX81
> From: Mike Hammett
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 8:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
> Don't use a Newton to admin it?

> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions

> Midwest Internet Exchange

> The Brothers WISP

> From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 9:10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF

> Been a few years since I used ePMP anything. The UI used to be dreadfully 
> slow.
> From: Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 8:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
> +1

> On 05/22/2017 03:22 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:

>> The power requirement is going to limit you to wifi type stuff I think.
>> ePMP in PTP mode. You can get the itty bitty Force180 for $85 each and in PTP
>> mode at that range you'll have somewhere near 200mbps aggregate.
>> I'm sure there are half a dozen Ubiquiti things which will also suffice. The
>> example ePMP below is at a range of .559 mile.
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Chuck McCown" < [email protected] >
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: 5/22/2017 4:06:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF

>>> Too much power. I don’t want to exceed 20 watts total. So one end of a radio
>>> needs to be in the 5-7 watt range.
>>> From: Bill Prince
>>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 2:04 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF

>>> Then do a 24 GHz system. That can go 2-1/2 miles with 5 nines. Low 
>>> interference.
>>> Will eat around 50 watts at each end though.
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>> On 5/22/2017 12:47 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

>>>> Scared of new technology.
>>>> Seems a bit too long range for that freq.
>>>> Worried about not enough time has elapsed to prove them out.
>>>> They sound expensive.
>>>> Everybody knows 60 GHz is all absorbed by the oxygen anyhow...
>>>> Not sure God would approve...
>>>> You all the same normal reasons...
>>>> From: Brett A Mansfield
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 1:44 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
>>>> For so little throughput a 5GHz setup would be the cheapest and probably 
>>>> best
>>>> setup.
>>>> What keeps you from being a believer of the 60GHz? I can show you the 
>>>> history of
>>>> some of my Ignitenet links that may just change your mind.

>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Brett A Mansfield

>>>> On May 22, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote:

>>>>> Not a believer yet. And we only need 100-250 Mbps max to the homes. 
>>>>> Actually
>>>>> probably more like 50 or 100 Mbps.
>>>>> Want it to be simple too. ONT has multiple ethernet ports on it. Just 
>>>>> extend
>>>>> those physical layer 0/1 connections.
>>>>> From: Cameron Crum
>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 1:34 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] extending fiber with RF
>>>>> What about a couple of 60GHz links with a single 5GHz AP as a backup? We 
>>>>> did
>>>>> this for a bank that needed to connect two buildings temporarily. Put a 
>>>>> MT on
>>>>> either side that ran IPSEC tunnel over the link with a failover script to 
>>>>> route
>>>>> traffic over the 5 GHz link if the 60 lost more than 50% of it's packets. 
>>>>> The 5
>>>>> GHz was slower, but they still had connectivity in the even of a heavy 
>>>>> rain.
>>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote:

>>>>>> Still puzzling over how to get ethernet the last 3000 feet. I have fiber 
>>>>>> to a
>>>>>> point along a rural road. The end is about 2000 feet from one home and 
>>>>>> 3000
>>>>>> feet from another.
>>>>>> Was looking at using the existing copper with VDSL line extenders. That 
>>>>>> was what
>>>>>> that week of math problems was all about. I am starting to lean away 
>>>>>> from that
>>>>>> solution because it is old copper. I really want to stop using it.
>>>>>> I don’t have a ROW that is legal. The old copper technically is in 
>>>>>> trespass and
>>>>>> the owner of the property is known to be a major PITA. So not sure if I 
>>>>>> can get
>>>>>> permission. Even then, we are talking about 5000 feet of fiber to place. 
>>>>>> There
>>>>>> will be some money involved.
>>>>>> Using wireless could be much cheaper. Will have to do a solar install 
>>>>>> with the
>>>>>> ONT and RF gear on a stub pole at the handhole.
>>>>>> Not sure what kid of RF. Don’t want to use an AP because I need two 
>>>>>> layer 2
>>>>>> connections from the ONT. Be more expensive to use an AP anyhow. So two 
>>>>>> PTP
>>>>>> systems. Rock solid, never fail type of system. Noise floor down there is
>>>>>> probably pretty low.
>>>>>> I could use a pair of rockets etc. Not wanting to lo-ball this, want it 
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> very solid.
>>>>>> What would you use?

> --

Reply via email to